XSF Discussion - 2022-06-06


  1. larma

    It was brought to my attention that XEP-0313 (MAM) advanced to stable without an XML schema. The XML schema is a formal requirement layed out in XEP-0001.

  2. jonas’

    oh no.

  3. mathieui

    Call the XEP Police!

  4. Zash

    🚨️

  5. moparisthebest

    > In order for a Standards Track XEP to advance from Proposed to Stable, it must: > be formally defined by an XML schema

  6. moparisthebest

    Hmm there are no exceptions for XEPs that don't even mention XML, so a whole host of XEPs are illegal

  7. moparisthebest

    368, 156, etc etc

  8. qy

    I think i noticed this when i tried to scrape them

  9. qy

    Many have nothing

  10. Zash

    We've been living in a lie!

  11. Ge0rG

    moparisthebest: can we deport the illegal XEPs?

  12. Ge0rG

    ,oO( To XEPxico? )

  13. emus

    Well guys, I think the point is may to discuss this circumstance and possible action instead of making fun :)

  14. emus

    Well folks, I think the point is may to discuss this circumstance and possible action instead of making fun :)

  15. emus

    Well folks, I think the point is best to discuss this circumstance and possible action instead of making fun :)

  16. moparisthebest

    Wait, you all aren't here to have fun? :/

  17. Ge0rG

    Wait, isn't having pedantic discussion about the content of some obscure documents not fun?

  18. Zash

    Sorry, it's a national holiday here and I'm legally required to have fun.

  19. Ge0rG

    It's also a national holiday where I am. Christian indoctrination is everywhere.

  20. emus

    😑️