https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0163.html#publish - that's where it's required for PEP
good-natured old robothas joined
konstantinoshas left
Kevhas joined
pasdesushihas joined
adiaholichas left
konstantinoshas joined
anamulhaquehas left
anamulhaquehas joined
adiaholichas joined
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
adiaholichas left
Tobias
ta
good-natured old robothas left
anamulhaquehas left
anamulhaquehas joined
konstantinoshas left
adiaholichas joined
konstantinoshas joined
Half-Shothas left
homebeachhas left
Matthewhas left
uhoreghas left
Half-Shothas joined
Matthewhas joined
homebeachhas joined
uhoreghas joined
good-natured old robothas joined
adiaholichas left
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
anamulhaquehas left
anamulhaquehas joined
Samhas left
Samhas joined
konstantinoshas left
Dele Olajidehas joined
adiaholichas joined
konstantinoshas joined
Samhas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
eevvoorhas joined
anamulhaquehas left
anamulhaquehas joined
adiaholichas left
Ingolfhas left
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
Andrzejhas joined
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
Samhas joined
adiaholichas joined
jinxdhas joined
djorzhas joined
anamulhaquehas left
anamulhaquehas joined
good-natured old robothas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
anamulhaquehas left
Apollohas left
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
djorzhas left
Ingolfhas joined
konstantinoshas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Andrzejhas left
Andrzejhas joined
Wojtekhas joined
good-natured old robothas joined
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
Samhas left
konstantinoshas joined
Samhas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
adiaholichas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
adiaholichas joined
Samhas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
gooyahas joined
Samhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
SteveFhas left
SteveFhas joined
Ingolfhas left
djorzhas joined
good-natured old robothas left
cloudedhas left
cloudedhas joined
anamulhaquehas joined
xnamedhas left
Apollohas joined
adiaholichas left
xnamedhas joined
adiaholichas joined
anamulhaquehas left
djorzhas left
Danielhas left
djorzhas joined
Danielhas joined
wladmishas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
good-natured old robothas joined
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
Wojtekhas left
djorzhas left
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
good-natured old robothas left
good-natured old robothas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Mx2has joined
good-natured old robothas left
chipmnkhas left
chipmnkhas joined
chipmnkhas left
chipmnkhas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
APachhas left
eevvoorhas left
Wojtekhas joined
emushas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
anamulhaquehas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
singpolymahas left
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
good-natured old robothas joined
djorzhas joined
gooyahas left
gooyahas joined
eevvoorhas joined
singpolymahas joined
djorzhas left
emushas joined
neshtaxmpphas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
neshtaxmpphas joined
anamulhaquehas left
singpolymahas left
good-natured old robothas left
pablohas joined
singpolymahas joined
Dele Olajidehas left
pablohas left
euhas left
singpolymahas left
anamulhaquehas joined
singpolymahas joined
djorzhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
eevvoorhas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Mikaelahas left
Mikaelahas joined
papatutuwawahas left
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
good-natured old robothas joined
djorzhas left
anamulhaquehas left
Andrzejhas left
good-natured old robothas left
euhas joined
singpolymahas left
jinxdhas left
singpolymahas joined
Vidakhas left
jinxdhas joined
djorzhas joined
eevvoorhas joined
Vidakhas joined
Mx2has left
rq77has joined
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
euhas left
Ray22has joined
Samhas left
Vidakhas left
Samhas joined
Ray22has left
Dele Olajidehas joined
singpolymahas left
singpolymahas joined
Vidakhas joined
harry837374884has left
adiaholichas left
euhas joined
harry837374884has joined
adiaholichas joined
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
Andrzejhas joined
adiaholichas left
Paganinihas joined
rebeld22has joined
Vidakhas left
adiaholichas joined
Vidakhas joined
Samhas left
Apollohas left
Samhas joined
adiaholichas left
Apollohas joined
xnamedhas left
Vidakhas left
good-natured old robothas joined
Zash
Hm, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802#section-6.1 is weird with tls-unique being obsolete-ish
Vidakhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
adiaholichas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Vidakhas left
adiaholichas left
Ingolfhas joined
papatutuwawahas joined
Vidakhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
moparisthebest
> Servers MUST implement the "tls-unique" [RFC5929] channel binding type, if they implement any channel binding.
that's weird wording in general
chipmnkhas left
chipmnkhas joined
Vidakhas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
singpolymahas left
konstantinoshas left
singpolymahas joined
Guus
I might have asked this before, but are there any re-usable BOSH-related load test implementations available anywhere?
antranigvhas left
gooyahas left
gooyahas joined
archas left
marc0shas left
andrey.ghas joined
Alexhas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Sam
Guus: I'm not sure if they were ever open sourced or still exist, but HipChat had some. You might try digging around in Atlassians old archived repos on GitHub.
jinxdhas left
singpolymahas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
singpolymahas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Vidakhas joined
eevvoorhas left
moparisthebest
are there non-BOSH-related load test implementations?
Kev
Multiple, but it depends what it is you want to load test.
archas joined
mimi89999has left
Guus
I only want to do some smoke-testing, with a little bit more than one client.
atomicwatchhas left
florettahas left
florettahas joined
Guus
Sam, any suggestions for https://github.com/orgs/atlassian/repositories?q=&type=all&language=&sort= ?
Guus
none of these give relevant results: bosh bind load xmpp jabber
debaclehas joined
mimi89999has joined
mimi89999has left
Sam
I dunno, I don't even remember what they were written in, sorry. Probably didn't end up open sourced.
djorzhas left
mimi89999has joined
Guus
np, thanks
rq77has left
mimi89999has left
mimi89999has joined
xnamedhas joined
moparisthebest
what I was getting at is if there are non-BOSH load testers, and you could find an xmpp->bosh proxy, you could run them through that
moparisthebest
I know the opposite direction exists but unsure about that direction
MattJ
Guus, Tsung used to be a popular choice
Guus
MattJ, does that do BOSH?
MattJ
It does HTTP and it does XMPP, I can't remember if it does BOSH specifically
Guus
stackoverflow says yes
Guus
I hadn't considered. THanks
MattJ
iirc it's extensible (but that may require erlang coding)
Vidakhas left
Vidakhas joined
moparisthebest
hey says right here it supports BOSH http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/1/01/about/#xmpp-jabber
moparisthebest
and websockets, this might be fun to compare connection methods with
Guus
I obviously first looked at StackOverflow before the author's site.
moparisthebest
of course
Guus
there's bound to be a docker image for this...
Samhas left
karoshihas left
Ingolfhas left
gooyahas left
gooyahas joined
Samhas joined
debaclehas left
xnamedhas left
singpolymahas left
debaclehas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
singpolymahas joined
emushas left
adiaholichas joined
Paganinihas left
intosihas left
atomicwatchhas joined
Vidakhas left
konstantinoshas joined
adiaholichas left
intosihas joined
rebeld22has left
Vidakhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Andrzejhas left
Samhas left
arc
Will there be a board meeting today?
Samhas joined
Holger
BTW https://github.com/processone/rtb is kind of a successor to Tsung, it tries harder to produce 'realistic' workloads, but it doesn't do BOSH/WebSocket.
adiaholichas joined
Vidakhas left
singpolymahas left
singpolymahas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
arc
Is anyone else here for it?
Vidakhas joined
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
rebeld22has joined
Paganinihas joined
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
Alexhas joined
Ingolfhas joined
chipmnkhas left
xnamedhas joined
chipmnkhas joined
Patigahas left
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
debaclehas left
arc
🙁 doesn't look like it
Andrzejhas joined
moparisthebest
why don't you ping them ?
gooyahas left
gooyahas joined
arc
Ralphm: here?
moparisthebest
it's ralphm , some clients are picky with caps, some not
anamulhaquehas joined
Zash
MattJ?
arc
At this point it doesn't look like it. I need to get to work
Vidakhas left
junaidhas left
djorzhas joined
Zash
If the chair doesn't show up for 15 minutes you're legally allowed to go to work
xnamedhas left
Vidakhas joined
emushas joined
Tim Rhas left
anamulhaquehas left
arc
Chair hasn't been to a meeting in more than a month. I'm already walking to work
MattJ
arc, I think we're all agreed about giving up on weekly meetings? (per email discussion)
Vidakhas left
arc
There needs to be a proposal and a vote
Vidakhas joined
Zash
And minutes!
arc
And to go with that the calendar event needs to be removed
arc
Exactly. We are an American 501c3 with an international board. There are rules and auditing.
antranigvhas joined
arc
Peter could go into more detail, but if the IRS investigates we need to have all our i's dotted and t's crossed. Until a official decision we still have weekly meetings every Thursday
antranigvhas left
antranigvhas joined
arc
Of course there's no legal requirement for weekly meetings. We could have annual meetings, even.
Zash
As a Swede, I often wonder where all the real meeting bureaucracy is hiding. Where are the two meeting minutes checkers who double check and attest to the meeting minutes?!
Vidakhas left
arc
That is a problem yes
arc
But biggest, we as a board representing body corporate decided on weekly meetings. To change that we need an official decision under the current parameters.
adiaholichas left
arc
One of the things to discuss is that this change would move from every meeting being open and public, to every "meeting" being private behind closed doors, because the board list is only for board members.
MattJ
Everyone on board has now agreed to my proposal to switch to email to conduct business
MattJ
Except you, I think?
MattJ
If you have concerns, share them
adiaholichas joined
MattJ
Probably via email is best :)
xnamedhas joined
MattJ
I'm also open to hearing other proposals
Dele Olajidehas left
MattJ
The only alternatives I see are 1) continue to fail to conduct any business because meetings don't happen, 2) dissolve the XSF
MattJ
Most organizations do not have weekly board meetings, I personally think that is a little excessive anyway
Ingolfhas left
MattJ
What matters is whether we can get stuff done, not how many meetings we have. We can just as easily meet our obligations to the organization without using XMPP to conduct our discussions.
pablohas joined
MattJ
I do agree about taking stuff private though - the vast majority of what we discuss can and should be public. We've agreed in the past that members@ would be a suitable venue.
debaclehas joined
adiaholichas left
MattJ
We might want to revisit that, e.g. a public read-only list (for non-board) that's separate
Maranda[x]has left
Vidakhas joined
xnamedhas left
neshtaxmpphas left
neshtaxmpphas joined
singpolyma
Just have a board@ muc that is only for business where only board gets voice. Open the meeting on the first, close on the 29th and snapshot log as minutes. Monthly meeting a month long!
Steve Killehas left
Guus
I was just going to suggest that.
Zash
That has existed forever but I'm not sure anything has ever been said there
Steve Killehas joined
Guus
I by no means think that this is a better idea - but it might be middle ground between 'live chat' and 'email'.
Tim Rhas joined
MattJ
I don't want to speak for anyone else, but if the issue is scheduling time, email is nice because it acts as a to-do... I can organize threads, flag them, mark them as unread, etc. if I know they require some action from me. I feel like I could easily lose chat messages (I mean, it happens to me all the time)
xnamedhas joined
Vidakhas left
djorzhas left
Apollohas left
Vidakhas joined
Wojtekhas left
Wojtekhas joined
Guus
perfectly reasonable
Guus
In unrelated news: Bosh with Tsung works.
adiaholichas joined
Guus
thanks for that.
Apollohas joined
MattJ
Yay
Dele Olajidehas joined
Vidakhas left
larmahas left
Vidakhas joined
larmahas joined
singpolymahas left
singpolymahas joined
anamulhaquehas joined
Tim Rhas left
Tim Rhas joined
Kev
FWIW, as a person who complains when Board stuff happens in private, either of the above proposals (board@ MUC or a public board@ mailing list where most stuff happens) would keep me happy.
Fishbowlerhas left
Fishbowlerhas joined
pep.
If I were a member I would also very much complain if stuff went even more private, as I did in the past already
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
Kev
I don't think anyone's suggesting making things more private - I was just pre-emptively *not* complaining about either of the suggestions :)
Vidakhas left
Titihas left
moparisthebest
I like the board@ muc better than email for dogfooding reasons but as long as you don't take it to discord or something I won't complain :D
arcxihas left
Vidakhas joined
anamulhaquehas left
konstantinoshas left
Zash
We just need a XEP to solve the timezone issue
Kev
As an uninformed outsider, I don't think timezones are the issue with Board meeting at the moment.
moparisthebest
A muc handles messages from different timezones just as well as email
karoshihas joined
Ellenor Malik
we need a xep for mail over xmpp
Ellenor Malik
(not kidding)
konstantinoshas joined
pep.
I guess with emails at least there is some kind of rich markup (/s)
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
singpolymahas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
arcxihas joined
adiaholichas left
adiaholichas joined
Vidakhas left
moparisthebest
no there isn't, only sickos write HTML emails
Vidakhas joined
arcxihas left
singpolymahas joined
papatutuwawahas left
pep.
There's no standard whatsoever, not everyone accepts the same subset, but at least there's a wire format that isn't dependent on the input format :)
singpolyma
Ellenor Malik: what do you think we are currently lacking to get this use case?
Ellenor Malik
really nothing, actually
Ellenor Malik
> I wrote:
> (not kidding)
This was a lie.
singpolyma
😂
djorzhas joined
arcxihas joined
singpolyma
Certainly there's no client focussed on this use case. I think you need the old archiving xep to get good "mail folders" stuff also, at least if you want IMAP like sync. Of course nothing stops us from just using IMAP for that ;)
adiaholichas left
singpolymahas left
singpolymahas joined
good-natured old robothas left
rq77has joined
karoshihas left
Vidakhas left
Wojtekhas left
Vidakhas joined
karoshihas joined
adiaholichas joined
Ray22has joined
Fishbowlerhas left
Fishbowlerhas joined
adiaholichas left
wladmishas left
wladmishas joined
wladmishas left
wladmishas joined
Sam
IIRC the IRS does require regular public board meetings (but not weekly). I think it's at least quarterly, but don't hold me to that number.