XSF Discussion - 2022-11-06

  1. jonas’

    singpolyma, optimizing for bash/sh is not what we're aiming for, sorry. Using /bin/sh may in the future detract someone from an improvement or simplification, thinking that not using /bin/bash was a deliberate choice (e.g. because a CI image does not have bash) and would incur significant cost to change.

  2. Guus

    I sometimes have the feeling that if half the effort that goes into debating stuff in this channel would go into actually building stuff, we'd get more things done.

  3. Guus

    Thanks for the feedback on the scripts. I've applied most of it to the PR. I've got an hour or so until I need to leave. Let's see if I can get the remaining features in.

  4. Guus

    jonas’ : do you happen to know if with xpath, one can select a declaration (eg: the stylesheet declaration)?

  5. pep.

    Guus, easy to say when you agree with the majority. That to me is telling others to shut up. No thank you

  6. jonas’

    Guus, prooobably not

  7. jonas’

    Guus, oh, you can actually

  8. jonas’

    the keyword is the `processing-instruction` node test

  9. Guus

    pep: I wasn't telling anyone to shut up. I was implying that people get things done rather than discuss getting things done.

  10. Guus

    jonas` oh, wow, I was already resorting to grep :)

  11. pep.

    All the same

  12. jonas’

    so something like `//processing-instruction("xml-stylesheet")` is the best what you can do, I think, because you cannot match "attributes" on PIs (that's not a thing)

  13. jonas’

    pep., now I would actually kindly ask you to stop berating people for getting things done, thanks. that is exactly the behaviour leading to volunteer burnout.

  14. jonas’

    I don't think you mean ill, you just seem to be lacking context.

  15. Guus

    `$ xmllint --xpath '//processing-instruction("xml-stylesheet")' --nowarning --dtdvalid xep.dtd xep-0001.xml` `<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='xep.xsl'?>`

  16. Guus


  17. pep.

    Are you serious? I get "kindly" insulted and you turn on me?

  18. jonas’

    I do not think anyone insulted you?

  19. jonas’

    if you feel so, please discuss, I didn't see any insult against you

  20. pep.

    Sometimes I wonder why I even bother do join this room again

  21. jonas’

    which is why your comment seemed uncalled for to me

  22. jonas’

    if you see this differently, please explain, because then *I* am clearly missing something and I'd like to do better

  23. Guus

    My intent wasn't insult, my intent was to suggest to get things done differently..

  24. jonas’

    from my perspective, Guus was alluding to the long discussion on e.g. the board ML or members ML on how to fix the editor situation, and if everyone instead invested the time spent in that particular discussion into hacking together shell scripts, we might as well have been done already.

  25. Guus

    If that offended you, I'm sorry - it was not the intent. Also: what jonas’ said.

  26. Daniel

    To me it seems the XSF is willing to pay someone to fix the editor work flow. On a contract basis not on employment (that would be an unreasonable ask though) however to put out a call for contract work we need to define what contract work is actually required (as someone who does do contract work: nothing is worse than a customer who doesn't know what they want). And it seems like people are currently working on defining what work needs to be done

  27. Daniel

    So everything is good and WIP

  28. Guus

    Almost got the PR in a state where I feel that the 'draft' status can be dropped, but my time ran out for this morning. Would appreciate more feedback (especially since one of the validation check implementation uses a _lot_ of duplication).

  29. Guus

    If someone else feels like taking this across the finishing line, please don't wait for me :)

  30. emus

    MSavoritias (fae,ve), singpolyma: I think most of it is described and estinated in the respecitve issues from jonas

  31. emus

    > MattJ: > 2022-11-05 11:47 (GMT+01:00) > Or if someone wants to perform the task of tracking someone down and getting contracts sorted, that would be a way forward too I can do that I can also start drafting things if you guide a bit and then.you can simply review

  32. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    > emus: > MSavoritias (fae,ve), singpolyma: I think most of it is described and estinated in the respecitve issues from jonas It is yes.

  33. emus

    > MattJ: > 2022-11-05 11:46 (GMT+01:00) > If someone in the community were to raise their hand and say that they have the skills and are available to implement this (voluntarily or at a reasonable rate) I don't see any reason we wouldn't take up that offer I think.Board should write that attempt to their members, and see if there is interest already

  34. emus

    > pep.: > 2022-11-05 11:56 (GMT+01:00) > What I'm saying is I think this is the wrong way around. The XSF decides to get somebody on board and puts the word out, not the other way around. People aren't going to show up magically. > If you manage to do it yourselves, then great, just don't die on us please ^ this

  35. emus

    For the recently closed issues jonas created on the Editor tooling, Georg was so kind and did an estimation of how much hours + the 40% extra I added on the issues required workload. Now they are closed and opened in new more detailed tasks ones. Now would like to call for someone with experience to tag the estimated workload and assumptions as it has been done here for example: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/1224 no reasoning required. All listings: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Editor%20Tooling

  36. Guus

    Do XEPs that have status 'Retracted' require an 'Approver'?

  37. Zash

    I would guess 'not', since it's something the Author does. https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#states-Retracted

  38. Guus

    It's also a common occurrence in the published xeps, I think.