XSF Discussion - 2022-12-17

btw, all this problem can be solved with the minimum amount of work by using the logo without text.

> emus: > Id prefer this formating: > XSF Discussion > Code of Conduct: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0458.html > Logs: https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ > Agenda: https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings Btw this hasnt been added to the chat as discussed some time ago ^ Is it still happening?

> Trung: > 2022-12-17 04:40 (GMT+01:00) > btw, all this problem can be solved with the minimum amount of work by using the logo without text. thats not the idea

MSavoritias (fae,ve): yes ... because some client dont support it :-)

They dont support showing a description?

i think its about line break

but I also dont like it as it is

the could be way more info

Hmm. We could add just another "|" and then the Code of Conduct line

So it will still be one line for terminal people and its visible

> As for alternatives, we've used hotel conference rooms before. Yes, there are plenty of locations in Brussels when Cisco does not work for some reasons. Many years ago I negotiated a good rate for a big meeting room in the hotel most of us were staying

Note that the CoC is not actually in force

The XEP is still experimental

Apart from that, I think the room topic is just fine

> ralphm: > Note that the CoC is not actually in force > The XEP is still experimental Well as a community we should have a CoC that is enforcing if we want to be welcoming and inclusive. And mention it in the title of course. So people are aware and feel more safe and odher people less likely to say/do stupid stuff. Anything stopping it from it being in force?

The operators room already points to guideline that includes the CoC fyi

it is probably already used as (non-authoritative) persuasive on connected topics like moderation

MSavoritias (fae,ve), ralphm, we should push the CoC XEP toward adoption, it has worked well enough in operators@ and there haven't been any further objections in over a year

if I got the timeline right

> Ellenor Malik: > it is probably already used as (non-authoritative) persuasive on connected topics like moderation Also true

> why do you need people automatically added to your roster anyway? it's not like that's a requirement for getting/sending messages or anything And I suppose no way of seeing the message archive of a foreign IM either as of right now, right?

What's the context?

Transports

> thats not the idea a logo with 4 colors is not the idea either. N°1 rule in designing logo: if it doesn't work in black&white it's not a logo. ✏

kurisu, you'll probably want to read XEP-0114 (Jabber Component Protocol) and XEP-0225 (Component Connections) for your bridge; and XEP-0144 (Roster Item Exchange) for sending contacts, though client support may be limited

But that's not something that'd work with most existing servers is it