XSF Discussion - 2023-01-03

  1. stpeter

    Hi all, I've created a draft agenda for the Board meeting this Thursday: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Board-Meeting-2023-01-05 ... feel free to edit.

  2. jonas’

    o/ stpeter

  3. jonas’

    did you see my (late) reply to your email?

  4. stpeter

    Hi Jonas!

  5. jonas’

    (also, happy new year!)

  6. stpeter

    Yes, I did. I'm still getting organized for 2023, but I will process & reply soon.

  7. emus

    moparisthebest: fyi ^

  8. jonas’

    ack, works for me, thanks!

  9. jonas’

    (just propose new timeslots, though I'll be much less available now because work is resuming)

  10. jonas’

    (but I'm sure we'll figure something out)

  11. jonas’

    off to prepare some dinner

  12. stpeter

    bon appetit!

  13. Tobi

    Are MUC PM messages supposed to be stored in a users MAM storage? According to XEP-0313 they are not stored in the MUC MAM archive, which makes sense imo.

  14. jonas’

    Tobi, they are type='chat', so generally yes

  15. dwd

    Tobi, the problem is that the user’s server can’t (often/always) tell if they were MUC PMs or ordinary direct messages, at least not without the server going and finding out what type the sending Jid is. So yes, they often end up in MAM - however, there was a move to mark them as MUC PMs, so they can easily be omitted then.

  16. Tobi

    Ta. The answer I was looking for :)

  17. dwd

    Tobi, See: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#privatemessage and note that bit about the <x/> element.

  18. emus

    Its quite nice if other open-source projects or organizations start following you as an organization 👍️

  19. lovetox

    But why would anyone want to omit them, this would mean they end up in no archive at all