XSF Discussion - 2023-01-09


  1. moparisthebest

    > It was designed and marketed as the last framework one would need for developing apps for Windows. Well now it is officially deprecated and will not receive any new features any more. Classic

  2. Daniel

    I don’t want to take away emus’ job but I'd personally be interested in an up to date list of people who are planning on going to the summit and a list of things people may want to talk about. https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Conferences/Summit_25

  3. MattJ

    I went to add Push 2.0, and as I hit save there was an conflict with your entry for the same topic, so I added my name :)

  4. MattJ

    I think after I finish auth stuff, revisiting push (actually implementing something new) will be next on my list, so it's a good time to talk about it

  5. Kev

    I'm intending to go, but knowing there's a block booking coming for the hotel I'm holding off until I hear about that.

  6. emus

    > Daniel: > 2023-01-09 12:18 (GMT+01:00) > I don’t want to take away emus’ job but I'd personally be interested in an up to date list of people who are planning on going to the summit and a list of things people may want to talk about. https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Conferences/Summit_25 Hey, my bad, I will shoot a mail tonight

  7. Kev

    Although we're getting to the point that it might end up being too late.

  8. Kev

    MattJ Are you intending risking UK trains, or are you doing something else this year?

  9. MattJ

    I'm risking the trains...

  10. MattJ

    Quite a gamble, so I don't know what I'll do if I lose

  11. Zash

    Train AND plane!

  12. pep.

    Take the full week, squat the hackerspace with your sleeping bag :P

  13. pep.

    This way you can arrive at any point before summit!

  14. Daniel

    why do both caps and caps2 include the hash as part of the node when requesting disco?

  15. Zash

    for caching, I think?

  16. Daniel

    the answering client shouldn’t need to know that?

  17. Daniel

    caching of what?

  18. Zash

    kinda like a HTTP ETag?

  19. Zash

    could allow returning a consistent reply when adding and removing features as well

  20. Zash

    there's a race condition; you broadcast hash(features) someone receives that and requests disco#info node=hash(features) ... you add some feature (+notify for example) so now caps is hash(features+x) ... you receive a request for hash(features), if you respond with features+x then the requester will get a response inconsistent with what they requested and conclude that you don't know how to do caps

  21. Zash

    Daniel, makes sense?

  22. Zash

    like, if you get a request where the node doesn't match your current feature set, you can ... do something

  23. Daniel

    yes I guess...

  24. emus

    All booked for Summit & FOSDEM 🛌️ 🚅️

  25. thilo.molitor

    > I think after I finish auth stuff, revisiting push (actually implementing something new) will be next on my list, so it's a good time to talk about it MattJ: the sasl upgrade tasks are still missing in prosody, right?

  26. thilo.molitor

    Would be nice to have an implementation to test monal against...

  27. MattJ

    thilo.molitor: yes

  28. thilo.molitor

    MattJ: but planned?