XSF Discussion - 2023-01-17

  1. moparisthebest

    Excellent wurstsalat !

  2. Guus

    moparisthebest was mentioning a 50% breakage on a specific s2s interaction, something to do with stream features. What exactly was that? I'm busy writing s2s tests for Openfire, would like to include that case...

  3. Guus

    Having the feature element not be prefixed, but explicitly declaring its namespace as the default namespace in the element itself, something like that?

  4. MattJ

    Yes

  5. pep.

    Basically supporting namespaces everywhere

  6. pep.

    Is 0453 (DOAP) officializing https://linkmauve.fr/ns/xmpp-doap# as a NS btw? Shouldn't this be moved to this very document?

  7. pep.

    Link Mauve, ^

  8. Guus

    k, I assume that Openfire does this right (let me know if anyone knows this to be false), but I'll add tests.

  9. Guus

    Does it make sense for an initiating entity to send a SASL response element, without having sent an auth element?

  10. jonas’

    no

  11. jonas’

    we have the character data of the <auth/> element for a SASL "initial response"

  12. jonas’

    (as used by PLAIN)