XSF Discussion - 2023-02-15

  1. ralphm

    Only just saw these messages. I am figuring out if I can attend

  2. intosi

    Voor de gein eens proberen: Star Wars Samba spelen in Spotify, en even op de progress bar letten.

  3. intosi

    Wrong window, apologies.

  4. intosi

    I guess it reached the intended recipient as well as 'some' others.

  5. Seve


  6. ralphm


  7. edhelas

    Dutch people in the XSF 😱

  8. Guus

    I'm not sure if "in the XSF" is a relevant distinction.

  9. Zash


  10. jonas’

    mathieui, you and me are the only ones who haven't filled out their reapplication yet

  11. jonas’

    (which means two things: we should do it, and Link Mauve is not due for reelection)

  12. Link Mauve


  13. Guus

    <insert leave-link-mauve-alone meme here>

  14. moparisthebest

    https://xmpp.org/about/xmpp-standards-foundation/ > The Council (2019-2020) consists of the following individuals: Should we just remove the years instead of fixing?

  15. MattJ

    I think we possibly had this conversation last year :)

  16. MattJ

    My personal opinion is that, while it's tempting to remove the years as a solution, it actually makes it harder to tell if the information is up to date

  17. Guus

    If we're going to change it, we might as well correct the list...

  18. Guus


  19. emus

    Guus: thanks

  20. moparisthebest

    MattJ: shouldn't board have a year too then? Also thanks Guus :)

  21. Zash

    board is timeless

  22. ralphm


  23. Guus

    moparisthebest: if you think that's best, simply put in the PR. That takes less time than discussing it here. :)

  24. moparisthebest

    I don't have a strong opinion, hence the question