XSF Discussion - 2023-02-18

  1. blockchaintradev removed by moderator

  2. vanitasvitae

    Here come the pyramid schemes

  3. emus

    Hi Board members, Have there been any chance to discuss on my points on the agenda?

  4. a moderator removed a message

    blockchain scam spam

  5. a moderator removed a message

  6. wurstsalat

    Hi folks! I just pushed a big change to xmpp.org's software section at https://xmpp.org/software/ This change unifies all kinds of software (clients, servers, libraries) into a single list "software.json", where each package can be in multiple categories. This enables us to have a "Tools" category for example (separate from "Libraries"). Also, you can now apply advanced filters to check for compliance (levels), and what I find quite useful: you can check for individual XEP support. These filters can be combined. Redirects from old pages have been put into place. Please test, and report any bug you find :)

  7. singpolyma


  8. nicoco

    wurstsalat: super sweet!

  9. wurstsalat

    nicoco, finally, a "Components" category ;)

  10. nicoco

    would it be OK if I moved 'slidge' to libraries, as in 'a library to make gateways', and make DOAP files for each component (ie, each legacy service)? I'm afraid I'd just invade the whole software list, but I'd be happy to ditch my feature table for something more accurate and detailed

  11. wurstsalat

    nicoco, let me think about it, not sure how to handle this best

  12. nicoco

    no hurry at all. I think I'll do the doap files anyway, but maybe I'll just render them in my docs or something along these lines

  13. emus

    wurstsalat: Great work again!

  14. wurstsalat

    thanks :)