-
pep.
jonas’: “It does support some kind of sticker-y feature, but in a protocol nobody else speaks” re pidgin, Movim does!
-
jonas’
oh nice
-
pep.
Poezio also does! (Enough to say "we don't support this" :p)
-
Zash
Didn't Pidgin calls sorta work with Gajim, Dino etc?
-
Zash
jonas’: Obligatory "achshually" ;)
-
pep.
Yeah it's probably for the best of this post isn't corrected anymore. Movim will probably be one of the first to support new stickers anyway :p✎ -
pep.
Yeah it's probably for the best if this post isn't corrected anymore. Movim will probably be one of the first to support new stickers anyway :p ✏
-
pep.
btw I have submitted https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1275, I hope that might be of interest to some. goffi? (poked e.dhelas already)
-
pep.
Anyody else doing pubsub? (that's everybody)
-
644043
.✎ -
644043
hi ✏
-
goffi
pep.: there is a typo at https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1275/files#diff-0ede34e71ae8ea7199b84fe09913b235f648e79c1549a055b3ddd90fee3211f8R2997 ("the service MUST theN retract")
-
goffi
otherwise, looks good to me.
-
Guus
For MAM, implementing the hints in XEP-0334 seems to introduce archives that have partial coverage of certain types - depending on the client that sent the message (and if it supports those hints). Is that preferable over a server-sided configuration that says "always (or never)" store a message without a body but with a child element of type XYZ?
-
Guus
(did that question make sense? it did in my head)
-
MattJ
I think server-side rules are generally good, yes, but they aren't discoverable and may lag behind. If a new XEP is written tomorrow and we do/don't want that in MAM, hints can help with that.
-
MattJ
or custom extensions that aren't XEPs, used with servers that don't understand those namespaces
-
Guus
I'm wondering if having _some_ clients having their empty-bodied messages stored in MAM, is introducing more confusion than having either all or none of them do that. That probably only applies to MUC archives though.
-
Zash
Should we advertise some kind of feature(s) wrt MAM rules?
-
Ge0rG
Zash: like `<feature var='urn:xmpp:carbons:rules:0'/>`?
-
Zash
Kinda, sorta.
-
pep.
goffi, thanks! Nothing to say about "the only two options"?
-
pep.
Stuff I mention in the mail to standards