XSF Discussion - 2023-05-11


  1. edhelas

    I'm maybe planning to complete https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0085.html

  2. edhelas

    With <recording-audio/> and <recording-video/>

  3. MattJ

    There is an existing XEP for that

  4. edhelas

    Ah :D ?

  5. pep.

    I just discovered the "Implementations" column in the extensions table, https://xmpp.org/extensions/ !! Awesome

  6. edhelas

    MattJ do you have the XEP number ?

  7. edhelas

    > I just discovered the "Implementations" column in the extensions table, https://xmpp.org/extensions/ !! Awesome 😍

  8. MattJ

    Hmm, seems like it wasn

  9. Ge0rG

    pep.: it's DOAP magic!

  10. pep.

    Ge0rG, yeah I got that :P

  11. MattJ

    Hmm, seems like it wasn't accepted: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/fsn.html

  12. pep.

    hmm maybe the button could be removed when there's no implementation for the spec

  13. pep.

    I guess I need to thank cal0pteryx (wurstsalat) for this :)

  14. cal0pteryx (wurstsalat)

    > hmm maybe the button could be removed when there's no implementation for the spec good point! :)

  15. edhelas

    Nah, it gives some kind of surprise and excitement before you click on it :p

  16. pep.

    cal0pteryx (wurstsalat), "how hard would it be" to have this directly in the specs?

  17. edhelas

    Maybe it would be interesting to split in two tables, clients and servers ?

  18. cal0pteryx (wurstsalat)

    pep.: Link Mauve once tried. there is a PoC somewhere

  19. pep.

    I know yeah, or rather pulko tried? But that got nowhere

  20. pep.

    I thought now that you have a base for it..

  21. cal0pteryx (wurstsalat)

    there: https://linkmauve.fr/extensions/xep-0004.html

  22. cal0pteryx (wurstsalat)

    but I remember people weren't 100% on displaying this info in the spec :)

  23. pep.

    Maybe in a <details/> tag?

  24. mjk

    wooo 🥳

  25. mjk

    > There is an existing XEP for that perhaps there's https://codeberg.org/moxxy/custom-xeps/src/branch/master/xep-xxxx-file-upload-notification.md specified as well, if we dig in the inbox deep enough?

  26. mjk

    ah, fsn is basically fun

  27. mjk

    I wonder if making fsn more under-engineered (read: remove upload progress support) would help its acceptance