XSF Discussion - 2023-06-04

singpolyma: with a few days delay: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0298.html is what you should use for transporting information about group call participant / stream matching if you use an SFU. And you also don't need multiple contents, you can just use multiple streams withing the same content.

larma: coin looks like it could be the basis for some of the more advanced SFU use cases, thanks. I'm not sure what the sdp level difference between multiple contents and multiple streams is. I thought media type (audio vs video etc) was usually at the content level?

Oh wow, coin has an rfc violation in it right now (two children of an iq set)

I'm calling the IETF police 🚔

ACAB?

I do appreciate that coin admits up front you don't need anything to do multiparty SFU style calls and have them at least work. Except to have implemented your jingle in sun a way that multiple audios or videos isn't an error of course, heh

So I'm going to try to get something going at that level before doing anything fancy

> ACAB? pep.: I don't think this belongs here

Please don't get him started about how everything is political 😅

Please don't get people started about how tech isn't political :)

As much as politicians like to use technology to their advantage, I fail to see how technology is political.

> ACAB? All Computers Are Broken! ↺

True

> cal0pteryx: > 2023-06-04 03:37 (GMT+02:00) > pep.: I don't think this belongs here +1

Is the type of <field var='FORM_TYPE' type='hidden'> required when setting a form ?

Are you submitting a form back to where you got it from?

If so, logically, they would know what field types there are, so it's a bit redundant. But some would say explicit > implicit 🙂

I'll still put it, but I was just wondering, 0060 examples always put it

Examples gonna example

For 0060 it's redundant I think, but not harmful. Other data form uses might be different