-
Guus
Daniel, the email text of this morning's update doesn't really reflect the changes. They seem to use the descriptions from the preexisting versioning block. That does not reflect the acceptance/rejection that triggered the mail.
-
Daniel
yes I wasn’t sure if reject means I need to add another revision
-
Daniel
i looked at the one previous rejected and that didn’t add one✎ -
Daniel
i looked at the one previous rejection and that didn’t add one ✏
-
Daniel
and because there is no new revision the tooling added the old changelog
-
Daniel
I guess if this happens again i'll just add a new version for the rejection
-
Guus
At least the subject line was correct.
-
Daniel
when moving to stable we obviously have new revision because we are going to 1.0 anyway
-
Daniel
but in case of rejection the case wasn’t clear to me
-
Guus
That, or somehow get the tooling to act differently.
-
Guus
It's probably a rare enough case to not worry about it too much
-
Guus
Maybe every status change, even rejection, warrants a new version? I dunno. Seems like the easiest workaround.
-
Daniel
yes that’s what I’m propably going to do
-
Daniel
don’t want to touch the tooling
-
Guus
Any Chinese speakers here? I've just added the first job listing that's partially in Chinese - wanted to make sure it made sense: https://xmpp.work/job/%e9%ab%98%e7%ba%a7xmpp%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e5%99%a8%e5%bc%80%e5%8f%91%e5%b7%a5%e7%a8%8b%e5%b8%88/
-
Guus
As an aside: has the XSF ever tried to partner up with Zoom, maybe as a sponsor or something?
-
Guus
Might be an opportunity there
-
MattJ
Guus: I believe stpeter knows people there, I think he was going to reach out
-
Guus
nice