XSF Discussion - 2024-08-06


  1. singpolyma

    mcneb10: they're interesting but don't scale past a few participants especially if they don't all have amazing internet

  2. mcneb10

    ah

  3. mcneb10

    i think i read somewhere xmpp supports intiating webrtc connections as well

  4. mcneb10

    do muji calls support omemo?

  5. singpolyma

    omemo doesn't really apply to calls, they use DTLS-SRTP

  6. SavagePeanut

    Dino is the only client I know that currently implements muji. It uses omemo to verify DTLS-SRTP in 1:1 calls. Unsure if it does for group calls to but don't see why it wouldn't

  7. SavagePeanut

    I believe this is the pseudo-xep for omemo verification https://gist.github.com/iNPUTmice/aa4fc0aeea6ce5fb0e0fe04baca842cd

  8. singpolyma

    there's no generic "this is a base64 encoded blob" tag in any xep is there? bob has one almost but it requires cid/type attributes and ibb is close but it requires seq and sid

  9. Schimon

    I am intending to work on a new online service which will be providing a syndication directory, and I want to to be based on XMPP.. Is there an XEP which is similat to Atomsub (XEP-0277 and XEP-0472), yet is for OPML data instead of Atom Syndication Format?

  10. Schimon

    _I am intending to work on a new online service which will be providing a syndication directory, and I want to to be based on XMPP PubSub._ Is there an XEP which is similat to Atomsub (XEP-0277 and XEP-0472), yet is for OPML data instead of Atom Syndication Format?

  11. Schimon

    > I am intending to work on a new online service which will be providing a syndication directory, and I want to to be based on XMPP PubSub. Is there an XEP which is similat to Atomsub (XEP-0277 and XEP-0472), yet is for OPML data instead of Atom Syndication Format?

  12. Daniel

    Zash, are you still ok with this PR https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1368 even though Link Mauve force pushed more changes?

  13. Link Mauve

    This change was a typo reported by xmppftw.

  14. Daniel

    ok

  15. Link Mauve

    “which may a few seconds” → “which may take a few seconds”

  16. Daniel

    Fair enough. What changes were made is not obvious for force pushes so I wanted to be sure

  17. Link Mauve

    I forgot GitHub doesn’t support changes between revisions like GitLab does…

  18. Zash

    Github does have a link to showing changes between force-pushes

  19. Kev

    Although everything pales in its usefulness compared to Gerrit :)

  20. jonas’

    Kev, are you sure you got that the right way around?

  21. Kev

    Yeah. I'll maintain that for good high quality review, Gerrit makes things easier than anything else I've used.

  22. Kev

    Although maybe that's rose-tinted glasses after not using it for a while. But the changeset stuff was streets ahead of gl/gh/bb. Maybe the in-place review wasn't.

  23. Zash

    Heh, what changeset review does github have?

  24. Zash

    > Zash, are you still ok with this PR https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1368 even though Link Mauve force pushed more changes? I can look after work but most likely fine with it

  25. Daniel

    I’m just gonna trust Link Mauve

  26. Zash

    Haven't I approved again anyway? I don't have a notification for that PR